Wednesday, August 03, 2011
Monday, August 01, 2011
I have been working on this for about a month, and read 56 papers about corporate misconduct and reputation. The vast majority are about financial misrepresentation, but some are about more "movie-like" types of misconduct. Fifty-six papers is a hefty number for a month, and by now I surely know a little bit about corporate misconduct, maybe "just enough to be dangerous": there's a lot that I don't know, but sometimes I feel confident enough to give suggestions to people that clearly know a great deal more than I do.
Case in point, a paper by Langus, Motta and Aguzzoni called "The Effect of EU Antitrust Investigations and Fines on Firm's Valuations". It is a great paper and I have almost presumed to send the authors an email suggesting that they look into some similar literature and also suggesting that they address a couple additional points.
The paper describes "dawn raids" performed by the EU antitrust authority to try to find evidence that companies are participating in cartels or illegal monopolies and concludes that the companies' stock prices are punished much more than the fines, mostly because the (economically profitable) activity is now likely to end. It doesn't mention similar literature about financial misconduct that comes to the same conclusion, or the economic theory of reputation of Klein-Laffler and Shapiro.
My presumption would probably cost me my chances of living in Barcelona or Milan when I finish the Ph.D., and I can't risk something like that.
Wednesday, April 20, 2011
Monday, April 18, 2011
The supply and demand slides that I use in the quiz session at UW Foster School of Business. This is the Spring 2011 version. There are two good things about them:
- They have a table for simultaneous shifts in supply and demand that can be handy for undergrads that are short on time
- They have some exercises with answers
Thursday, April 07, 2011
I keep telling my students that the GPA doesn't matter. Some students get super stressed when they get a 3.4 in a test or a 3.7 in homework, and many cheat - and sometimes covertly admit they have cheated - just to improve their GPA.
So I'll quote the CNN article "So you want to work at Google":
You'll be heartened to hear that a 3.0 GPA doesn't necessarily wreck your prospects at Google. McDowell acknowledges that the 3.7-or-higher-GPA myth is widespread, but she discounts it. "When I joined Google, my team of eight people included three who didn't have college degrees at all," recalls McDowell. "And our next college hire had a GPA that wasn't so hot."
She adds: "Academia is merely one way to distinguish yourself, and there are plenty of others. So if your GPA, or your school, doesn't stand out, look for additional avenues. Besides, you'll need to excel in multiple areas to get your resume selected."
The last piece is very important. Academia is only one way to distinguish yourself. Having a 3.0 GPA and winning the entepreneurial competition could be much better than getting a 4.0 GPA by being the teachers pet and having no other passion than getting a 4.0 GPA. On its own, a 4.0 GPA means nothing.
Saturday, April 02, 2011
Who gets paid more to speak at an university? Snooki from Jersey Shore or a Nobel-Prize winning novelist?
It's fun to think that the assumption of a lot of microeconomics is that people are rational.
Tuesday, March 29, 2011
They say money can't buy happiness — but can good looks do the job?
Although this is interesting, it's sure to annoy econometricians.
I thought I should store this so I can make fun of IDC four years from now.
Saturday, March 26, 2011
If your lifetime plan includes writing an article or a book, you may need to learn how write a rather large document in LaTeX. Or maybe you are co-writing a document (Andrew and I did a big homework once and synchronizing files can be tricky).
The subfiles package can help with that. The documentation for subfiles is here.
It allows you to write a master file and several subfiles that can be compiled independently, so you can work on and compile each subfile (for example, a chapter or a section) and see the results, and compile the master file to see the full book. A simple and useful example can be found in Wikibooks.
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
The relations between First Quantum and the Democratic Republic of Congo have gone from bad to worse in recent months, after the country expropriated the miner’s $765 million Kolwezi copper tailings project in September. Blog
I was going to be his TA this quarter. Well, if he wants me, I'll still be!
Thursday, March 17, 2011
The good news in Japan was that the winds had been pushing the radiated plumes from the stricken Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant out into the Pacific Ocean, away from populated areas. The winds would likely prevent more harm from happening to the earthquake-and-tsunami-battered region.
The law of demand in action: a bottle of iodide pill went from $6 to $140 in the West Coast.
Wednesday, March 16, 2011
I wrote a tutorial on how to implement some portfolio optimizers in R for a class. The tutorial implements three types of factor models:
- A Fama-French three factor model
- An industry cross-sectional model
- A principal component analysis model
This is for instructional purposes only: it's not a software for you to plug in your portfolio and start investing. However, if you make millions doing so, I wouldn't mind a 10% cut.
Two things that are not in the tutorial but that are important if you really want to implement something for real use are:
- Selecting the data that will be used for optimization (I use the Dow Jones Industrial Average from 2006 to 2010)
- Optimizing Sharpe ratios by combining the portfolio with a risk-free asset (such as T-bills)
Monday, March 14, 2011
I recently had to prepare a paper about the impacts of the Dodd-Frank legislation for a class. Rather randomly, I chose the Durbin Amendment, a provision that increases regulation on the debit card market. What I learned about the debit and credit card market was fascinating.
The amendment passed into law in July 2010 and the Fed is now discussing how it will be regulated, and this is where the relevant points appear. For example, the amendment requires a price cap on the fees that merchants have to pay, but it doesn't say how much. The average fee in 2010 was about 44 cents, and the Fed set the cap at 12 cents, cutting heavily into the profits of (I can safely say) your bank. As a consequence, you may pay more for checking, but is this really bad?
Thursday, March 10, 2011
It is very possible that many of my Managerial Economics students will scour the web for class notes (instead of using the course website). And maybe, just maybe, after spending some time on Wikipedia's article on Managerial Economics and in some random essay mills, they may find the lecture notes here.
It's very possible that looking at the course website would have been faster, but the course website is not integrated with Facebook and not accessible through Google, so I'm just making it easy on them.